Paid a premium for GoComet and still feel ripped off. We shelled out steep subscription and onboarding fees expecting fewer calls and cleaner runs, but the tracking glitches and support keep pushing us back to manual fixes - no real savings showed up. If you're watching every mile and dollar like we do on the West Coast, this didn't pay for itself; I'd rather spend that cash fixing bad loads than on features that don't work.
Bottom line: the live-tracking map and ETA pings are the feature that actually made this worth using. I'm an owner-operator with seven years up in the Northeast and those realtime updates (and POD photos) cut down my check-calls big time, definatly saved me hours. Not flawless - every so often the GPS lags or a carrier forgets to update - but for the most part that tracking alone pays for itself.
Last December a sudden Snoqualmie Pass closure left one of our reefers idling and a customer breathing down my neck. GoComet’s live reroute suggestion popped up, I accepted it, and it booked an alternate lane and pushed an updated ETA to the consignee in under ten minutes - saved us a detention fee and calmed a driver who was about ready to lose it. After four years running a five-truck dispatch outfit in the Pacific Northwest, that quick automated reroute is the one feature I actually brag about to other dispatchers.
Yesterday a critical lane’s ETA jumped three times in two hours on GoComet’s live tracking and we missed a customer cutoff because dispatch relied on the latest estimate. The visibility tools themselves are detailed - map overlays, carrier notes and exception flags make issues obvious - yet the frequent, unexplained ETA shifts undermine confidence and force us to double-check manually. I run a 200-truck fleet in the Southwest with thirty years in the business, and that tension - powerful insight when correct, disruptive when not - sums up my view: promising, but not steady enough for high-stakes moves.
Rate it, and the next carrier reading this page sees what you found.
