The load visibility portal is maddeningly slow and prone to timeouts when we need it most. Yet the ETAs and pings are surprisingly accurate - saved us headaches while managing 40 trucks across the Midwest - so I'm torn between sticking with Mode for the data and wanting a platform that actually stays responsive.
Three years behind the wheel on the West Coast, I hit a nightmare detour after a bridge closure on a midnight run and thought my day was toast. Mode's dispatcher actually called me, updated the load in their app while I sat on the shoulder, rerouted me, and pushed for detention pay - that one person who solved the problem made all the difference. Invoice timing was a little slow afterward, but because of that quick save they get four stars from me.
Bottom line: Mode Global was competent, but I can't say the price always justified the results. Their technology improved load visibility and they handled tight intermodal windows well, yet for our steady Southeast lanes the brokerage and managed-transport fees plus recurring accessorials cut into margins more than the modest rate relief they provided. For a 55-truck operation I've run for twelve years, that leaves me genuinely torn - useful in spikes, hard to defend as a constant cost.
I've used Mode for nine years. For my 60-truck fleet in the Southeast, the thing that stood out was their intermodal pricing - saved us roughly $100–150 a load on JAX–CHI runs and cut down on empty miles. Billing's simple enough that I'm not spending half my week on disputes, so for the price it's been worth sticking with them.
Rate it, and the next carrier reading this page sees what you found.
